Natural Theology & Natural Law: Twin Pillars of the Reformed Classicalist Distinctive — The Reformed Classicalist
It is difficult to miss that the critics of natural theology and the critics of natural law are almost always the same critics. This is true outside of Reformed circles as well, yet among the Reformed it takes on a particular theme. I have called it elsewhere the “soteriological critique of nature.”
It is difficult to miss that the critics of natural theology and the critics of natural law are almost always the same critics. This is true outside of Reformed circles as well, yet among the Reformed it takes on a particular theme. I have called it elsewhere the “soteriological critique of nature.” In simple terms, the questions of soteriology (since the Reformation had a recovery of the core elements of the gospel as its main concern) came to swallow up questions of reason and nature. Because of Reformed Orthodox polemics against what I call “the big four” of the seventeenth…
saved by
related reading
- “Insufficient” or “Inconclusive” Objections — The Reformed Classicalistreformedclassicalist.com
- Theology Checktheologycheck.blog
- Thomas Aquinas on Natural Theology - Credo Magazinecredomag.com
- Philosophical Theology: An Introduction with James Dolezal | Theology Checktheologycheck.blog
- Microsoft Word - If Knowledge Then God.docproginosko.com
- Natural theology - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Franciscus Junius, Old Princeton, and the Question of Natural Theology | Clearly Reformedclearlyreformed.org
- Naturalized epistemology - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Categories Were Made For Man, Not Man For The Categories | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Funhouse Goddess | Lapham’s Quarterlylaphamsquarterly.org
- The Project Gutenberg E-text of Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, by David Humegutenberg.org
- Stove, What Is Wrong With Our Thoughtsweb.maths.unsw.edu.au