Seventy-five Years After Indian Partition, Who Owns the Narrative? | The New Yorker
Literature once filled in archival gaps by saying the unsayable. Now a younger generation is devising new modes of telling the story and finding new stories to tell.
Save this story Save this story Before it was an edict, and a death sentence, it was a rumor. To many, it must have seemed improbable; I imagine my grandmother, buying her vegetables at the market, settling her baby on her hip, craning to hear the news—a border, where? Two borders, to be exact. On the eve of their departure, in 1947, after more than three hundred years on the subcontinent, the British sliced the land into a Hindu-majority India flanked by a Muslim-majority West Pakistan and East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), a thousand miles apart. The boundaries were drawn up in five weeks by an
related reading
- Literary Hub >> How the Violence of Partition Forged National Identity in South Asialithub.com
- “The Third and Final Continent,” by Jhumpa Lahiri | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- 100 Best Books of the 21st Century - The New York Timesnytimes.com
- What Have Fourteen Years of Conservative Rule Done to Britain? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Old Directions | The Editorsnplusonemag.com
- How the MFA swallowed literatureerikhoel.substack.com
- Salman Rushdie · Imaginary Homelandslrb.co.uk
- Hiroshima | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- XXI. On Breakdownsubstack.com
- The Best Books of 2023 | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The Mixed Asian Metaphorvulture.com
- My Mother’s Dreams for Her Son, and All Black Children | The New Yorkernewyorker.com