Mechanisms too simple for humans to design - by Malmesbury
substack.com · 4,228 words · saved by 1 readers
Does a bacterium fit on a floppy disk?
Disclaimer: This article is about living organisms, and how they are sculpted by evolution. Any use of mathematics is metaphorical, not literal – it's only there to give a sense of scale. Apologies to all the people who got correctly offended by my shamelessly hand-wavy references to Kolmogorov complexity. As we all know, humans are terrible at building butterflies. We can make a lot of objectively cool things like nuclear reactors and microchips, but we still can't create a proper artificial insect that flies, feeds, and lays eggs that turn into more butterflies. That seems like evidence…
related reading
- Mechanisms too simple for humans to designmalmesbury.substack.com
- Mechanisms too simple for humans to design — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Book Review: Design Principles of Biological Circuits — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Thou Art Godshatter — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Living Things Are Not Machines (Also, They Totally Are)noemamag.com
- It's hard to write code for computers, but it's even harder to write code for humans · Erik Bernhardssonerikbern.com
- The real data wall is billions of years of evolutiondynomight.net
- Is life a complex computational process?aeon.co
- Biology is a Burritoasimov.press
- Do the simplest thing that could possibly workseangoedecke.com
- Why AI is harder than we thinknews.ycombinator.com
- Simplicity is An Advantage but Sadly Complexity Sells Bettereugeneyan.com