Addendum: Endgame Perils of Restaking - by Tripoli
dataalways.substack.com · 994 words · saved by 1 readers
Clarifying some details from Endgame Perils of Restaking.
A supplement to Endgame Perils of Restaking. Restaking protocols are explicitly framed as opt-in, but when we examine how out-of-protocol yield distorts the incentive structures of the Ethereum Network, we see that over time, restaking can become a macroscopically coercive force on all validators. The subsidization of an open-set of validators allows adopters to operate in a lower base APR environment and out-compete non-adopting validators. This dynamic is not unique to restaking; it is also observed with liquid staking tokens and MEV-boost. However, the three have different risk factors…
saved by
related reading
- Time, slots, and the ordering of events in Ethereum Proof-of-Stake - Paradigmparadigm.xyz
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to Ethereum - Delphi Digitalmembers.delphidigital.io
- Approaches to MEV: Ethereum vs Cosmos | Reveriereverie.ooo
- EigenLayer: the Harbinger of Restakingbankless.com
- Should Ethereum be okay with enshrining more things in the protocol?vitalik.eth.limo
- EigenLayer: Decentralized Ethereum Restaking Protocol Explained | Consensysconsensys.net
- How much should you pay for restaking security?arxiv.org
- Understanding Ethereum's Staking Landscape: The Evolution of DeFi & Restakingdecentralised.co
- Reflections on Restaking | Reveriereverie.ooo
- Semantics of Staking 1: Liquefaction — The price of agencymirror.xyz
- ETH Is Not Ultrasound Money: Part 1 - by Jon Charbonneaujoncharbonneau.substack.com
- Issuance Issues — Initial Issue<br><p class="small"><small>*^ Playing with the [polysemic](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/polysemic) nature of the word, [issue](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/issue), to mean both "a notes.ethereum.org