The Stupidity of Computers | Issue 13 | n+1
Computers are near-omnipotent cauldrons of processing power, but they're also stupid. They are the undisputed chess champions of the world, but they can't understand a simple English conversation. IBM’s Watson supercomputer defeated two top Jeopardy! players last year, but for the clue “What grasshoppers eat,” Watson answered: “Kosher.” For all the data he could access within a fraction of a second—one of the greatest corpuses ever assembled—Watson looked awfully dumb.
Dumb Computers are near-omnipotent cauldrons of processing power, but they’re also stupid. They are the undisputed chess champions of the world, but they can’t understand a simple English conversation. IBM’s Watson supercomputer defeated two top Jeopardy! players last year, but for the clue “What grasshoppers eat,” Watson answered: “Kosher.” For all the data he could access within a fraction of a second—one of the greatest corpuses ever assembled—Watson looked awfully dumb. Hard Labor Consider how difficult it is to get a computer to do anything. To take a simple example, let’s say we…
related reading
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 1 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- Infinite midwit - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- As Rocks May Think | Eric Jangevjang.com
- alan turing - computing machinery and intelligencecourses.cs.umbc.edu
- Creating The People’s Computer | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Stephen Wolfram Writingswritings.stephenwolfram.com
- The Universe of Discourseblog.plover.com
- Man-Computer Symbiosisgroups.csail.mit.edu
- What Does It Mean for AI to Understand? | Quanta Magazinequantamagazine.org
- Meaningful | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Does the Bitter Lesson Have Limits?dbreunig.com