Of Course We’re Living in a Simulation | WIRED
wired.com · 3,715 words · saved by 1 readers
The only people who absolutely disagree are, well, scientists. They need to get over themselves and join the fun.
Save this story Save this story The best theory physicists have for the birth of the universe makes no sense. It goes like this: In the beginning—the very, if not quite veriest, beginning—there’s something called quantum foam. It’s barely there, and can’t even be said to occupy space, because there’s no such thing as space yet. Or time. So even though it’s seething, bubbling, fluctuating, as foam tends to do, it’s not doing so in any kind of this-before-that temporal order. It just is, all at once, indeterminate and undisturbed. Until it isn’t. Something goes pop in precisely the right way, an
related reading
- Do We Live in a Simulation? Chances Are about 50–50 | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com
- Here’s Why We Might Live in a Multiverse | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com
- Finally We May Have a Path to the Fundamental Theory of Physics… and It’s Beautiful-Stephen Wolfram Writingswritings.stephenwolfram.com
- What Does Any of This Have To Do with Physics? - Nautilusnautil.us
- Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?simulation-argument.com
- Are You Living in a Simulation?simulation-argument.com
- The Hour I First Believed | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- The Universe Is Not Locally Real, and the Physics Nobel Prize Winners Proved It | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com
- Derek Parfit · Why anything? Why this?lrb.co.uk
- Boltzmann brain - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- [1802.02231] Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing?arxiv.org
- The Beginning of Infinity, Part 1nav.al