Bound by the Bounty: Collaboratively Shaping Evaluation Processes for Queer AI Harms | Montreal AI Ethics Institute
🔬 Research Summary by Nathaniel Dennler and Queer in AI. Nathan is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Southern California and a member of the Queer in AI organization; their personal work is in…
🔬 Research Summary by Nathaniel Dennler and Queer in AI . Nathan is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Southern California and a member of the Queer in AI organization; their personal work is in adapting robot behaviors to end-users. Queer in AI works to raise awareness of queer issues in AI/ML and to foster a community of queer AI researchers. [ Original paper by Organizers of Queer In AI, Nathan Dennler, Anaelia Ovalle, Ashwin Singh, Luca Soldaini, Arjun Subramonian, Huy Tu, William Agnew, Avijit Ghosh, Kyra Yee, Irene Font Peradejordi, Zeerak Talat, Mayra Russo, Jess de Jesus de Pinho
saved by
related reading
- Queer in AI: A Case Study in Community-Lead Participatory AIarxiv.org
- Challenges in evaluating AI systems \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to meblog.redwoodresearch.org
- What we’d like to fund — Paradigm 3paradigm3.org
- [2004.07213] Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimsarxiv.org
- Auditing language models for hidden objectives — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Who Should Stop Unethical A.I.? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Ten AI safety projects I'd like people to work onthirdthing.ai
- Biasjzhao.xyz
- secret-loyalties-whitepaper.pdfformationresearch.com
- WAO - The Workers' Algorithm Observatorywao.cs.princeton.edu