Cursor · CursorBench
cursor.com · 753 words · saved by 1 readers
Compare CursorBench 3.1 results across the models Cursor evaluates.
Cursor · CursorBench Cost Tokens Steps Model Score Cost Cost / task Tokens Tokens / task Steps Steps / task 1 Fable 5 Max 72.9 % $ 18.02 63,842 76 2 Fable 5 Extra High 72.0 % $ 13.74 48,754 63 3 Fable 5 High 70.6 % $ 10.81 37,173 54 4 Fable 5 Medium 69.8 % $ 8.27 28,507 47 5 Opus 4.7 Max 64.8 % $ 11.02 62,989 96 6 GPT-5.5 Extra High 64.3 % $ 4.37 17,905 46 7 Fable 5 Low 64.2 % $ 5.70 18,882 36 8 Opus 4.8 Max 63.8 % $ 7.59 77,370 60 9 Composer 2.5 63.2 % $ 0.55 15,152 37 10 GPT-5.5 High 62.6 % $ 3.59 13,329 40 11 Opus 4.8 Extra High 62.1 % $ 6.14 55,622 54 12 Opus 4.7 Extra High 61.6 % $ 7.11 4
saved by
related reading
- Cursor: AI coding agentcursor.com
- Compare AI Models: Pricing, Context & Benchmarks | OpenRouteropenrouter.ai
- Cursor: AI coding agentcursor.sh
- AI Model & API Providers Analysis | Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai
- Cursor: AI coding agentcursor.com
- FrontierSWEfrontierswe.com
- UI Skills for Design Engineers | UI Skillsui-skills.com
- BalatroBenchbalatrobench.com
- How we compare model quality in Cursorcursor.com
- There's An AI For That® — The front page of AItheresanaiforthat.com
- Kayla (@kayladotdev) on Xx.com
- Coding vs thinking — Paradigm 3paradigm3.org