flâneur

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) on X: "I posted this because I disliked the takes on the podcast, and I dislike some takes in response to my post, so would like to clarify my position re: Dwarkesh vs Jensen. Dwarkesh Patel is a great podcaster, unnaturally so. Clearly he has studied his predecessors – chiefly Friedman https://t.co/iKkozmyriy" / X

x.com · 656 words · saved by 1 readers

Don’t miss what’s happening People on X are the first to know. Log in Sign up Post See new posts Conversation Teortaxes (DeepSeek 推特铁粉 2023 – ∞) @teortaxesTex I posted this because I disliked the takes on the podcast, and I dislike some takes in response to my post, so would like to clarify my position re: Dwarkesh vs Jensen. Dwarkesh Patel is a great podcaster, unnaturally so. Clearly he has studied his predecessors – chiefly Friedman – and engineered a methodology doing away with their frustrating defects, from the perspective of his core TA – tech-literate Americans, above-average in intelligence. Thus he provides real value to me as well. Many times has he goaded powerful men to spell out beliefs I could only conjecture they held. Is he sometimes overdoing it? No doubt. Could he do it even better in theory, helping them speak out their view of the bigger picture? For sure. But practice is scant on examples of consistently better podcasters (I'm partial to @alethios3 myself), and

@teortaxesTex: I posted this because I disliked the takes on the podcast, and I dislike some takes in response to my post, so would like to clarify my position re: Dwarkesh vs Jensen. Dwarkesh Patel is a great podcaster, unnaturally so. Clearly he has studied his predecessors – chiefly Friedman – and engineered a methodology doing away with their frustrating defects, from the perspective of his core TA – tech-literate Americans, above-average in intelligence. Thus he provides real value to me as well. Many times has he goaded powerful men to spell out beliefs I could only conjecture they held.

saved by

related reading