Noah Smith's Review of Power and Progress is Very, Very Bad
programmablemutter.com · 4,573 words · saved by 1 readers
It should have been disowned, not republished
I didn’t expect to have more uncomplimentary things to say about the unfortunate intellectual relationship between (a few) economists and (a few) Silicon Valley billionaires right away. But Noah Smith republished his review of Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson’s Power and Progress this morning as part of a feud with Acemoglu and Johnson over whether we ought be trying to “steer” the development of AI. A “timely repost” he says. Not so much. When Noah first put up his review, I responded, pointing out some of the things it got very badly wrong about the book it purported to describe. Then, he…
saved by
related reading
- Noah Smith's Review of Power and Progress is Very, Very Badprogrammablemutter.com
- Book Review: "Power and Progress"noahpinion.blog
- Book review: "Power and Progress"noahpinion.blog
- Stripe Press — Ideas for progresspress.stripe.com
- builders vs. prigs (ft. arjun ramani)substack.com
- Progress Studies reading list — Daniel Maydanielmamay.github.io
- The Renaissance of Rise and Grindinvesting1012dot0.substack.com
- Tech Strikes Back - The New Atlantisthenewatlantis.com
- Capital, AGI, and Human Ambition - The Intelligence Curseintelligence-curse.ai
- The Silicon Valley Canon: On the Paıdeía of the American Tech Elite – The Scholar's Stagescholars-stage.org
- Daron Acemoglu on X: "A thread about what is wrong with the influence of Elon Musk and other tech billionaires. Another thread about content moderation will follow later this week. Obviously, the problem isn’t that Musk is expressing his opx.com
- Rule Thinkers In, Not Out — LessWronglesswrong.com