flâneur

The Frame-Dependent Mind

softmax.com · 1,757 words · saved by 3 readers

Consider the humble apple. If I hold one up and ask, “What is this?”, you might reasonably say “an apple.” But this seemingly trivial act of identification conceals something profound: a frame has just been imposed on reality. We’ve drawn a boundary in spacetime, declaring “this is an apple, not that” and “the apple ends here.” But is this boundary real or invented? Does the apple-ness inhere in an object out in the world, or does it depend on us interacting the world? A botanist might point out that the “apple” is actually a swollen stem—the fruit’s flesh developed from the flower receptacle, not the ovary. A physicist sees not an apple but a temporary configuration of atoms. A cellular biologist notices that many of the cells in “your” apple aren’t even Malus domestica cells but rather various microbial species. A Buddhist monk might observe that the apple exists only through its relationships—to soil, sun, water, pollinating insects, and the evolutionary history that shaped it. None

Consider An Apple Consider the humble apple. If I hold one up and ask, “What is this?”, you might reasonably say “an apple.” But this seemingly trivial act of identification conceals something profound: a frame has just been imposed on reality. We’ve drawn a boundary in spacetime, declaring “this is an apple, not that” and “the apple ends here.” But is this boundary real or invented? Does the apple-ness inhere in an object out in the world, or does it depend on us interacting the world? A botanist might point out that the “apple” is actually a swollen stem—the fruit’s flesh developed from…

saved by

related reading