Why I’m optimistic about our alignment approach
aligned.substack.com · 6,588 words · saved by 1 readers
Some arguments in favor and responses to common objections
Why I’m optimistic about our alignment approach Some arguments in favor and responses to common objections Jan Leike Dec 05, 2022 62 16 2 Share OpenAI’s approach to alignment research involves perfecting RLHF , AI-assisted human evaluation , and automated alignment research . Why is this a good strategy? What are the reasons to be optimistic about it? My optimism stems from five sources: Positive updates about AI. A lot of developments over the last few years have made AI systems more favorable to alignment than they looked initially, both in terms of how the AI tech tree is shaking out and th
related reading
- Why I’m optimistic about our alignment approachaligned.substack.com
- Alignment is not solved but it increasingly looks solvablealigned.substack.com
- Alignment remains a hard, unsolved problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- “Alignment Engineering” vs. “Misalignment Science”lesswrong.com
- Tips for Empirical Alignment Research — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Can we safely automate alignment research? - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- A minimal viable product for alignment - by Jan Leikealigned.substack.com
- Thoughts on the impact of RLHF research — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Thoughts on the impact of RLHF research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Explaining AI Alignment as an NLPer and Why I am Working on Itruiqizhong.substack.com
- How far does alignment midtraining generalize?alignment.openai.com