flâneur

The philosophic turn for AI agents: replacing centralized digital rhetoric with decentralized truth-seeking | Mind & Society

link.springer.com · 9,851 words · saved by 1 readers

In the face of rapidly advancing AI technology, individuals will increasingly rely on AI agents to navigate life’s growing complexities, raising critical concerns about maintaining both human agency and autonomy. This paper addresses a fundamental dilemma posed by AI decision-support systems: the risk of either becoming overwhelmed by complex decisions, thus losing agency, or having autonomy compromised by externally controlled choice architectures reminiscent of “nudging” practices. While the “nudge” framework, based on the use of choice-framing to guide individuals toward presumed beneficial outcomes, initially appeared to preserve liberty, at AI-driven scale, it threatens to erode autonomy. To counteract this risk, the paper proposes a philosophic turn in AI design. AI should be constructed to facilitate decentralized truth-seeking and open-ended inquiry, mirroring the Socratic method of philosophical dialogue. By promoting individual and collective adaptive learning, such AI system

1 Introduction Modernity has greatly expanded opportunities for individuals. It has also vastly increased the burden of questions that individuals need to take on board for opportunities to be realized. With increasing capabilities of AI and their impact on how we live and work, this trend stands to dramatically accelerate. It will increasingly be the case that effectively operating in the modern world will require the assistance of AI agents that help us make choices and help us identify what choices and questions we should consider. Against this background, we face an apparent dilemma…

saved by

related reading