Why you should still bother with analog art — Design / Art Practice

Even with the best digital tools, you should sometimes still use analog techniques as a safe, future proof default.

Why you should still bother with analog art Feb 16 Written By Maria Matveeva Even with the best digital tools, you should sometimes still use analog techniques as a safe, future proof default. As tools and techniques advance, it’s reasonable to question the time and hassle that go into making physical artwork for source materials like patterns and backgrounds. It’s getting easier and faster to recreate very similar effects using Photoshop or other tools. Why bother with analog? I believe the difference is in quality, complexity, and making the artwork future proof. Here’s an example. Pattern m

saved by

• Tommy Adebiyi

related reading

• Analog and digital technology - What's the difference?explainthatstuff.com
• benjamin.pdfweb.mit.edu
• File over appstephango.com
• Ugmonkugmonk.com
• The Philosophy of Digital Art (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
• J. R. Carpenter || A Handmade Webluckysoap.com
• The Afterlives of Computer Artemptysetmag.com
• A Brief Rant on the Future of Interaction Designworrydream.com
• The Unbelievable Zombie Comeback of Analog Computing | WIREDwired.com
• A Brief Rant on the Future of Interaction Designworrydream.com
• Learn How to Get Risograph Textures: A Deep Dive into the Risograph Brush & Texture Kitretrosupply.co
• Contrasting Aestheticsrauno.me