The Elephant in the Courtroom | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 11,532 words · saved by 1 readers
A curious legal crusade to redefine personhood is raising profound questions about the interdependence of the animal and human kingdoms.
Save this story Save this story According to the civil-law code of the state of New York, a writ of habeas corpus may be obtained by any “person” who has been illegally detained. In Bronx County, most such claims arrive on behalf of prisoners on Rikers Island. Habeas petitions are not often heard in court, which was only one reason that the case before New York Supreme Court Justice Alison Y. Tuitt—Nonhuman Rights Project v. James Breheny, et al.—was extraordinary. The subject of the petition was Happy, an Asian elephant in the Bronx Zoo. American law treats all animals as “things”—the same ca
related reading
- Do Elephants Have Souls? - The New Atlantisthenewatlantis.com
- Great ape personhood - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- An Animal's Place - Michael Pollanmichaelpollan.com
- Orangutan granted controlled freedom by Argentine court | CNNedition.cnn.com
- Eating Meat and Eating Peopler.jordan.im
- Emotional support animals may be a thing, but seven tigers? Sorry, this fad has gone far enough | Elle Hunt | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- The Animals Issuefaculty.philosophy.umd.edu
- An ant is drowning: here’s how to decide if you should save itaeon.co
- What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun?davidgraeber.org
- Shooting an Elephant | The Orwell Foundationorwellfoundation.com
- What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun?thebaffler.com
- Animal Rights Philosophy – Speaking of Researchspeakingofresearch.com