Banning Words Won’t Make the World More Just - The Atlantic
theatlantic.com · 2,526 words · saved by 1 readers
What’s a “justice-involved person”?
The Sierra Club’s Equity Language Guide discourages using the words stand , Americans , blind , and crazy . The first two fail at inclusion, because not everyone can stand and not everyone living in this country is a citizen. The third and fourth, even as figures of speech (“Legislators are blind to climate change”), are insulting to the disabled. The guide also rejects the disabled in favor of people living with disabilities , for the same reason that enslaved person has generally replaced slave : to affirm, by the tenets of what’s called “people-first language,” that “everyone is first and f
related reading
- Politics and the English Language | The Orwell Foundationorwellfoundation.com
- jamesgerity.com/biblio/authority.pdfjamesgerity.com
- The Hyper-Complex Use of Language in Activismfannyvassilatos.com
- Taboo Your Words — LessWronglesswrong.com
- In Favor of Niceness, Community, and Civilizationslatestarcodex.com
- Sometimes It’s O.K. to Let a Language Die | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Taboo Your Words — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Feminist Philosophy of Language (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Do Words Mean Anything Anymore?evilfemale.substack.com
- The Ontology of Womanhoodevilfemale.substack.com
- The First Annual Stanford List of Banished Wordsstanforddaily.com
- The Origins of Wokenesspaulgraham.com