Webber’s scholarship shapes Supreme Court debate | Queen's Law
As Canada’s highest court considers the constitutional future of Quebec’s Bill 21, Professor Grégoire Webber’s rethinking of the notwithstanding clause is now central to one of the most consequential Charter cases.
Through his scholarship on the notwithstanding clause, Professor Grégoire Webber, Canada Research Chair in Public Law and Philosophy of Law (2014–2024), is influencing a constitutional debate now before the Supreme Court of Canada. Through his scholarship on the notwithstanding clause, Professor Grégoire Webber, Canada Research Chair in Public Law and Philosophy of Law (2014-2024), is influencing a legal debate now before the Supreme Court of Canada. As Canada’s highest court considers the constitutional future of Quebec’s Bill 21, Professor Grégoire Webber ’s rethinking of the notwithstanding
saved by
related reading
- Supreme Court Did the Right Thing in Child Pornography Rulingcarleton.ca
- Businesses fear impact of Quebec language law, as some consider leaving province - The Globe and Mailtheglobeandmail.com
- Quebec bill could hurt tech sectorlinkedin.com
- The “Social Death” of Muslim Women in Quebec – The Rovertherover.ca
- René Lévesque speaks with students of Scarborough College (25 Mar. 1968)youtube.com
- The supreme court’s voting rights decision is a death knell for American democracy | Moira Donegan | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Locke v. Davey - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Quebec will not administer free flu shots this falltheglobeandmail.com
- Supreme Court of Canada rules Uber arbitration clause invalid and a ‘classic case of unconscionability’ - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPosler.com
- Justice Gorsuch and what is owed to American Indiansscotusblog.com
- N.B. student newspapers worry how they'll fare following Meta news ban | CBC Newscbc.ca