More People Means More Good - by Étienne Fortier-Dubois
etiennefd.substack.com · 1,466 words · saved by 7 readers
AWM #71: Misanthropy is deeply wrong; we ultimately need more of us 👶
There’s a certain kind of argument that goes like this: “Humans are responsible for $BAD_THING. Therefore the way to solve $BAD_THING is to have fewer humans, or no humans at all.” (Substitute the $BAD_THING variable with whatever problem your society currently has. A popular one is climate change.) Let’s call this the Misanthropic Argument. The Misanthropic Argument is a bad argument. Actually, “bad” is too mild. It’s an evil argument. Accepting it — and following it to its logical conclusions — is one of the worst things you can possibly think. This strong statement shouldn’t surprise…
saved by
related reading
- ⚡️ Towards Ineffective Altruismreboothq.substack.com
- Why I am not a longtermist – Windows On Theorywindowsontheory.org
- There are no sane policy solutions to population collapseparentingthrough.substack.com
- There's a place for everyone - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- Against neutrality about creating happy lives - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- stop trying to be a "good person"substack.com
- Matt Yglesias Considered As The Nietzschean Supermanastralcodexten.com
- Mini Blog Post 8: What altruism means to me - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io
- How evolutionary biology makes everyone an existentialistaeon.co
- The Tiny Flicker of Altruismfrommatter.substack.com
- You Do Not Speak For The Bees.corsaren.com
- Why aesthetic value should take priority over moral valueaeon.co