MacKenzie Scott's $26 Billion Sugar Pile | Garry's List
garryslist.org · 1,381 words · saved by 1 readers
Forbes celebrates her as history's greatest giver. But without stewardship, the outcomes are spotty at best.
Speed without stewardship isn’t philanthropy - it’s negligence dressed up as virtue. Speed without stewardship isn’t philanthropy - it’s negligence dressed up as virtue. TL;DR p]:m-0"> MacKenzie Scott has given away $26 billion faster than anyone in history — with no oversight, and no accountability for the chaos that follows . Philanthropy without stewardship is negligence. Big money giving has big bad effects. Forbes wants you to believe otherwise. This is the pedestal they created: Forbes celebrates Scott’s $26 billion giving spree as historic generosity. But speed without stewardship isn’t
related reading
- The third wave of American philanthropy - by Nan Ransohoffnanransohoff.substack.com
- On caringmindingourway.com
- On Medici and Thiel - by Rohit Krishnanstrangeloopcanon.com
- Against Against Billionaire Philanthropy | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Zvi’s Thoughts on the Survival and Flourishing Fund (SFF) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Four Lessons From $4 Billion in Impact-focused Givingssir.org
- The Deaths of Effective Altruism | WIREDwired.com
- Yield Givingyieldgiving.com
- Left Organizing Is in Crisis. Philanthropy Is a Major Reason Why. | The Nationthenation.com
- How to actually give money awayforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Bill Gates Has Perfected Managerial Philanthropypalladiummag.com
- The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropyhbr.org