flâneur

Critical review of sham surgery clinical trials: Confounding factors analysis - PMC

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · 6,433 words · saved by 1 readers

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site. The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now. aDepartment of Infectious, Parasitic, and Immune-Mediated Diseases, Epidemiology Unit, Reference Centre on Phylogeny, Molecular Epidemiology, and Microbial Evolution (FEMEM), National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy bUnit of Clinical Pathology and Microbiology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy cFaculty of Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Italy dSchool of Law, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy eMedical Direction of Campus Bio-M

Ann Med Surg (Lond) . 2016 Oct 29;12:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.10.007 Critical review of sham surgery clinical trials: Confounding factors analysis Massimo Ciccozzi Massimo Ciccozzi a Department of Infectious, Parasitic, and Immune-Mediated Diseases, Epidemiology Unit, Reference Centre on Phylogeny, Molecular Epidemiology, and Microbial Evolution (FEMEM), National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy b Unit of Clinical Pathology and Microbiology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy Find articles by Massimo Ciccozzi a, b , Rosa Menga Rosa Menga c Faculty of Medicine, Campus Bio-

saved by

related reading