[1905.04792] Incentives Don't Solve Blockchain's Problems
A blockchain faces two fundamental challenges. It must motivate users to maintain the system while preventing a minority of these users from colluding and gaining disproportionate control. Many popular public blockchains use monetary incentives to encourage users to behave appropriately. But these same incentive schemes create more problems than they solve. Mining rewards cause centralization in "proof of work" chains such as Bitcoin. Validator rewards and punishments invite attacks in "proof of stake" chains. This paper argues why these incentive schemes are detrimental to blockchain. It considers a range of other systems---some of which incorporate monetary incentives, some of which do not---to confirm that monetary incentives are neither necessary nor sufficient for good user behavior.
Incentives Don’t Solve Blockchain’s Problems arXiv:1905.04792v1 [cs.CR] 12 May 2019 Shea Ketsdever Michael J. Fischer Department of Computer Science, Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, USA Yale University, New Haven, USA shea.ketsdever@yale.edu michael.fischer@yale.edu…
related reading
- On Collusionvitalik.eth.limo
- btcProcFC.pdfcs.cornell.edu
- [1904.05234] Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchangesarxiv.org
- [2305.09032] Time is Money: Strategic Timing Games in Proof-of-Stake Protocolsarxiv.org
- Decentralizing the Builder Rolejoncharbonneau.substack.com
- Timing Games in Responsive Consensus Protocolsarxiv.org
- Foundations+of+Cryptoeconomic+Systems.pdfresearch.wu.ac.at
- Degraded Blockchainsfortressofdoors.com
- How much should you pay for restaking security?arxiv.org
- Unbundling PBS: Towards protocol-enforced proposer commitments (PEPC) - Economics - Ethereum Researchethresear.ch
- State of research: increasing censorship resistance of transactions under proposer/builder separation (PBS) - HackMDnotes.ethereum.org
- EE 374: Blockchain Foundations at Stanfordweb.stanford.edu