Democracy should be sentimentalist not rationalist | Aeon Essays
aeon.co · 3,589 words · saved by 1 readers
Reason and facts cannot be the basis of political debates and civic life. Love and laughter are the heart of the matter
Something is amiss with democracy. Ask people from any or no political persuasion and they’re likely to give a similar story: contemporary politics has gone haywire because one side (or both) has lost touch with reality. We are living in a ‘post-truth’ partisan news hellscape that prioritises ‘feelings over facts’ and disregards the natural authority of the truth. But all sides seem to agree that there is a ‘truth’ that explains what really makes someone a woman, or an institution racist, or a politician fascist, in a way that compels acceptance from those who otherwise disagree. What we…
related reading
- Rationality is an underrated way to be authentichenrikkarlsson.xyz
- In Praise of the Godssimonsarris.substack.com
- Pragmatism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationality: A-Z — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Feeling Rational — LessWronglesswrong.com
- New LessWrongnewlesswrong.com
- Why I'm not a philosophergleech.org
- #3 Regime Change: Rationalism in politicsdominiccummings.substack.com
- Against truthsamkriss.substack.com
- The radical idea that people aren't stupidexperimentalhistory.substack.com
- You don't get to know what you're fighting formindingourway.com