Catching AIs red-handed
If your AIs are trying to escape, it's crucial to think about whether you can catch them before they succeed, because catching them red-handed gives you lots of options you didn't have before.
Catching AIs red-handed If your AIs are trying to escape, it's crucial to think about whether you can catch them before they succeed, because catching them red-handed gives you lots of options you didn't have before. Buck Shlegeris and Ryan Greenblatt May 07, 2024 5 1 Share [Originally posted on LessWrong .] We’ve been spending a lot of time recently thinking about how to mitigate risks posed by scheming (a.k.a. deceptively aligned) models intentionally subverting your safety techniques in order to cause an unacceptable outcome. We empirically investigated techniques that are robust to intenti
saved by
related reading
- The case for ensuring that powerful AIs are controlled — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Notes on handling non-concentrated failures with AI control: high level methods and different regimesblog.redwoodresearch.org
- Catching AIs red-handed — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Thoughts on the conservative assumptions in AI controlblog.redwoodresearch.org
- AI catastrophes and rogue deployments - by Buck Shlegerisblog.redwoodresearch.org
- The Case Against AI Control Research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How can we solve diffuse threats like research sabotage with AI control?blog.redwoodresearch.org
- How do we (more) safely defer to AIs? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The case for ensuring that powerful AIs are controlledblog.redwoodresearch.org
- AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Reading Listblog.redwoodresearch.org