The Death of the Legal Subject: How Predictive Algorithms Are (Re)constructing Legal Subjectivity
facctconference.org · 7,109 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
The Death of the Legal Subject: How Predictive Algorithms Are (Re)constructing Legal Subjectivity Katrina Geddes ABSTRACT 1 1 INTRODUCTION This paper explores the epistemological differences between the Across a range of settings, legal decision-making relies increasingly socio-political legal subject of Western liberalism, and the algorith- on predictive algorithms…
saved by
related reading
- When is automated decision making legitimate?fairmlbook.org
- AI and prediction of criminal justice risk: revisiting the COMPAS dataset, experiments, and the problem of algorithmic bias and fairnesslink.springer.com
- Algorithmic decision-making in financial services: economic and normative outcomes in consumer creditlink.springer.com
- INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AS A FRAMEWORK FOR ALGORITHMIC ACCOUNTABILITY | International & Comparative Law Quarterly | Cambridge Corecambridge.org
- The impact of AI errors in a human-in-the-loop processlink.springer.com
- Netherlands: We sense trouble: Automated discrimination and mass surveillance in predictive policing in the Netherlands - Amnesty Internationalamnesty.org
- Beyond explainability: justifiability and contestability of Algorithmic Decision Systemsinria.hal.science
- EUR-Lex - 62021CJ0634 - ENeur-lex.europa.eu
- Microsoft Word - 03_Trites Volume 11 issue 2 Final.docxgmj-canadianedition.ca
- Algorithmic Accountabilitydatasociety.net
- Machine Learning and the Rule of Law - SFI Presssfipress.org
- Socially disruptive periods and topics from information-theoretical analysis of judicial decisionsepjdatascience.springeropen.com