The Limits of Colorization of Historical Images by AI
hyperallergic.com · 751 words · saved by 1 readers
Contrary to what you might think, a problem isn't occurring because there are more white people in some historical photo dataset.
For most of the history of photography, if you had a black and white photograph and wanted to see it in color, you had to add the pigment with a paintbrush. Recently though, digital methods, and now artificial intelligence-driven methods, have made colorization available to everyone. This is a victory for technological progress! Or is it? As a recent twitter thread demonstrated, AI colorization algorithms don’t quite get it right. If you take an existing color image, convert it to grayscale and use an AI colorization algorithm to repaint it, the re-colorized image looks dull in comparison. To
related reading
- The Controversial History of Colorizing Black-and-White Photos | PetaPixelpetapixel.com
- The Passionate Photo Colorizers Who Are Humanizing the Pastatlasobscura.com
- Touching up: are we wrong to colourise old photographs? – The Irish Timesirishtimes.com
- Are Colorized Photos Rewriting History?gizmodo.com
- AI photo restoration shines a light on life in old Ireland | CNNcnn.com
- Better Images of AIbetterimagesofai.org
- Machina Lucida: Reflections on Artificial Images by Lucas Gelfondspikeartmagazine.com
- Lonely Surfaces: On AI-generated Imagestheconvivialsociety.substack.com
- the unreasonable effectiveness of dithering | Jonathan Dobresjdobr.es
- What Colour are your bits? - Ansuz - mskala's home pageansuz.sooke.bc.ca
- Epistemic calibration and searching the space of truththesephist.com
- El automágico traje del emperador | by Bikolabs | bikolabsmedium.com