On how various plans miss the hard bits of the alignment challenge — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 21,288 words · saved by 1 readers
Nate Soares reviews a dozen plans and proposals for making AI go well. He finds that almost none of them grapple with what he considers the core prob…
x On how various plans miss the hard bits of the alignment challenge — LessWrong 2022 MIRI Alignment Discussion Research Agendas AI Risk Threat Models (AI) AI Curated 322 On how various plans miss the hard bits of the alignment challenge by So8res 12th Jul 2022 AI Alignment Forum 35 min read 91 322 Ω 98 This post has been recorded as part of the LessWrong Curated Podcast, and can be listened to on Spotify , Apple Podcasts , and Libsyn . (As usual, this post was written by Nate Soares with some help and editing from Rob Bensinger.) In my last post , I described a “hard bit” of the challenge of
related reading
- Alignment remains a hard, unsolved problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- A central AI alignment problem: capabilities generalization, and the sharp left turn — LessWronglesswrong.com
- “Alignment Engineering” vs. “Misalignment Science”lesswrong.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Deep Deceptiveness — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- Defining alignment research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Plans A, B, C, and D for misalignment risk — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Case Against AI Control Research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What Is The Alignment Problem? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Automated Alignment is Harder Than You Think — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Another (outer) alignment failure story — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org