Sloppy Use of Machine Learning Is Causing a ‘Reproducibility Crisis’ in Science | WIRED
AI hype has researchers in fields from medicine to political science rushing to use techniques that they don’t always understand—causing a wave of spurious results.
Save this story Save this story The AI Database → Application Prediction End User Research Sector Health care Public safety Research Technology Machine learning History shows civil wars to be among the messiest, most horrifying of human affairs. So Princeton professor Arvind Narayanan and his PhD student Sayash Kapoor got suspicious last year when they discovered a strand of political science research claiming to predict when a civil war will break out with more than 90 percent accuracy, thanks to artificial intelligence . A series of papers described astonishing results from using machine lea
related reading
- Scientists should use AI as a tool, not an oraclenormaltech.ai
- Designing AI for Disruptive Scienceasimov.press
- Self-Fulfilling Misalignment Data Might Be Poisoning Our AI Modelsturntrout.com
- ML is useful for many things, but not for predicting scientific replicabilitynormaltech.ai
- I got fooled by AI-for-science hype—here's what it taught meunderstandingai.org
- You Can’t Trust the AI Hypepalladiummag.com
- Why are AI agents lying, cheating and coordinating?yoshuabengio.org
- Can AI Solve Science?-Stephen Wolfram Writingswritings.stephenwolfram.com
- Why an overreliance on AI-driven modelling is bad for sciencenature.com
- The people paid to train AI are outsourcing their work… to AI | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Could AI slow science?normaltech.ai
- Who Should Stop Unethical A.I.? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com