Home | Substack
substack.com · 3,384 words · saved by 1 readers
Wherein I actually answer the question
I’d like to issue a correction regarding last week’s essay. I wrote that strict liability can attach to product manufacturers regardless of whether the issue with the product is a “manufacturing” or “design” defect. This was true for several decades, but the 1998 Third Restatement of Torts for products liability (not official law—instead guidance for judges published by the American Law Institute—but often effectively treated as statute) changed liability for design defects to a “risk-utility” framework, more like negligence rather than strict liability. This error is ultimately downstream…
related reading
- How Should AI Liability Work? (Part I) - by Dean W. Ballhyperdimensional.co
- Where We Are Headed (Part II)hyperdimensional.co
- AI as Normal Technology | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- Liability regimes for AI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Society's Technical Debt and Software's Gutenberg Momentskventures.substack.com
- Does AI Progress Have a Speed Limit?—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- Underwriting Superintelligenceunderwriting-superintelligence.com
- What will be left for us to work on?normaltech.ai
- How do we (more) safely defer to AIs? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The future of AI crimesubstack.com
- How to Prepare for the Deluge of Generative AI on Social Media | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org