What if states don't listen? A fundamental gap in x-risk reduction strategies — EA Forum
forum.effectivealtruism.org · 5,165 words · saved by 1 readers
Summary/TLDR: The EA Community exerts almost no focus on state sovereignty as a crucial consideration in mitigating existential risks. Efforts to mit…
Summary/TLDR: The EA Community exerts almost no focus on state sovereignty as a crucial consideration in mitigating existential risks. Efforts to mitigate existential risks in tandem with the international community have broadly restricted themselves to technical problem-solving, incentive-building and capacity-building. This leaves out a considerable set of cases where states are non-compliant with actions that could improve existential security. As a relative newcomer to the community who has an academic background in international relations and international law - accompanied by personal…
saved by
related reading
- Existential Risks: Threats to Humanity’s Survivalexistential-risk.com
- Notes on Existential Risk from Artificial Superintelligencemichaelnotebook.com
- Doing EA Better — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Your Solution Doesn't Know Your Problem Existsblog.atlascomputing.org
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Existential_Risk_and_Growth.pdfphiliptrammell.com
- Radical Optionality — Governing Transformative AI Under Uncertaintyradical-optionality.ai
- How I think about catastrophic biological risk (part I): risk breakdown by type of responsedefensesindepth.bio
- Post 45: Simplify EA Pitches to “Holy Shit, X-Risk” - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io
- The current bottleneck is political will, not research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI Tools for Existential Securityforethought.org
- 10 big projects for reducing bio x-riskdefensesindepth.bio