A brain implant changed her life. Then it was removed against her will. | MIT Technology Review
technologyreview.com · 2,026 words · saved by 1 readers
Her case highlights why we need to enshrine neuro rights in law.
A brain implant changed her life. Then it was removed against her will. | MIT Technology Review Skip to Content Sticking an electrode inside a person’s brain can do more than treat a disease. Take the case of Rita Leggett, an Australian woman whose experimental brain implant changed her sense of agency and self. She told researchers that she “became one” with her device. She was devastated when, two years later, she was told she had to remove the implant because the company that made it had gone bust. The removal of this implant, and others like it, might represent a breach of human rights, et
related reading
- Neuralink and the Brain's Magical Future — Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- When Mind Melds With Machine, Who’s in Control? | WIREDwired.com
- Brain implant lets man with complete paralysis spell out thoughts | Hacker Newsnews.ycombinator.com
- An ALS patient set a record communicating through a brain implant: 62 words per minute | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Speaking With The Mind | Neuralinkyoutube.com
- The Neurologist Who Hacked His Brain—And Almost Lost His Mind | WIREDwired.com
- The Neurotechnology Age. Brain-computer interfaces exist today… | by Matt Angle | Mediummedium.com
- The Goals of Neurotechnologymilan.cvitkovic.net
- Mind-reading devices can now predict preconscious thoughts: is it time to worry?nature.com
- Whole Brain Emulation: No Progress on C. elegans After 10 Years — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How electrical brain stimulation can change the way we think | The Weektheweek.com
- The Degradation Drug - The American Scholartheamericanscholar.org