Don't overthink poverty in the United States

Our welfare state programs work well, but they are relatively stingy

I found Matthew Desmond’s piece on poverty for the New York Times Magazine to be vexing, over-complicated, and in key respects, outright wrong. Most things in life require a degree of nuance, but the truth about comparative poverty in the U.S. is genuinely very simple: the absolute poverty rate in the United States is unusually high for a rich country because our welfare state is stingy. If we had a generous universal (or universal-ish) cash assistance program for parents and children, the poverty rate would be much lower. If our existing programs for elderly, disabled, and unemployed…

related reading

• Why Does the Richest Country in the World Have So Many Poor Kids? (Update) - Freakonomicsfreakonomics.com
• Universal Basic Income and Poverty — LessWronglesswrong.com
• Nintil - The Non-Non-Libertarian FAQnintil.com
• Why effective altruism is not effective - ABC Religion & Ethicsabc.net.au
• The short history of global living conditions and why it matters that we know it | Our World in Dataourworldindata.org
• The meaning of ‘pro-poor’ (as understood by the World Bank) - Development Pathways: A DT Global Companydevelopmentpathways.co.uk
• The Birth of the New American Aristocracy - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
• Extreme poverty: How far have we come, and how far do we still have to go? | Our World in Dataourworldindata.org
• The Meridian of Her Greatnesssamzdat.com
• On the Experience of Being Poor-Ish, for People Who Aren'tnews.ycombinator.com
• America and Europe Are Equally Poorpalladiummag.com
• Reddit - Please wait for verificationreddit.com