Should AI Be Open? | Slate Star Codex
I. H.G. Wells’ 1914 sci-fi book The World Set Free did a pretty good job predicting nuclear weapons:They did not see it until the atomic bombs burst in their fumbling hands…before the l…
I. H.G. Wells’ 1914 sci-fi book The World Set Free did a pretty good job predicting nuclear weapons: They did not see it until the atomic bombs burst in their fumbling hands…before the last war began it was a matter of common knowledge that a man could carry about in a handbag an amount of latent energy sufficient to wreck half a city Wells believed the coming atomic bombs would be so deadly that we would inevitably create a utopian one-world government to prevent them from ever being used. Sorry, Wells. It was a nice thought. But imagine that in the 1910s and 1920s, some elites had…
saved by
related reading
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Thoughts on AI 2027 - Machine Intelligence Research Instituteintelligence.org
- Which Future?michaelnotebook.com
- Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart Peopleidlewords.com
- My Takeaways From AI 2027astralcodexten.com
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Which Future?michaelnotebook.com
- Why AI Will Save the World | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- Reflections on “Making the Atomic Bomb” – Windows On Theorywindowsontheory.org
- Notes on Existential Risk from Artificial Superintelligencemichaelnotebook.com
- The Problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI and Leviathan: Part I - by Samuel Hammond - Second Bestsecondbest.ca