Should AI Be Open? | Slate Star Codex
I. H.G. Wells’ 1914 sci-fi book The World Set Free did a pretty good job predicting nuclear weapons:They did not see it until the atomic bombs burst in their fumbling hands…before the l…
I. H.G. Wells’ 1914 sci-fi book The World Set Free did a pretty good job predicting nuclear weapons: They did not see it until the atomic bombs burst in their fumbling hands…before the last war began it was a matter of common knowledge that a man could carry about in a handbag an amount of latent energy sufficient to wreck half a city Wells believed the coming atomic bombs would be so deadly that we would inevitably create a utopian one-world government to prevent them from ever being used. Sorry, Wells. It was a nice thought. But imagine that in the 1910s and 1920s, some elites had…
saved by
related reading
- II. From AGI to Superintelligence: the Intelligence Explosion - SITUATIONAL AWARENESSsituational-awareness.ai
- Why AI Will Save the World | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 2 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Downtime.com
- My Takeaways From AI 2027astralcodexten.com
- Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart Peopleidlewords.com
- dreamofmachin.es/machine_prophecy.htmldreamofmachin.es
- Which Future?michaelnotebook.com
- There Is No A.I. | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- IIId. The Free World Must Prevail - SITUATIONAL AWARENESSsituational-awareness.ai
- The Problem — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The 'Don't Look Up' Thinking That Could Doom Us With AItime.com