Longtermists Should Work on AI - There is No "AI Neutral" Scenario - EA Forum
Summary: If you’re a longtermist (i.e you believe that most of the moral value lies in the future), and you want to prioritize impact in your career choice, you should strongly consider either workin…
Tom 3y 32 0 0 I think this is a bit too strong of a claim. It is true that that overwhelming majority of value in the future is determined by whether, when, and how we build AGI. I think it is also true that a longtermist trying to maximize impact should, in some sense, be doing something which affects whether, when, or how we build AGI. However, I think your post is too dismissive of working on other existential risks. Reducing the chance that we all die before building AGI increases the chance that we build AGI. While there probably won't be a nuclear war before AGI, it is quite possible tha
related reading
- Why I am not a longtermist – Windows On Theorywindowsontheory.org
- You will be OK — LessWronglesswrong.com
- My current impressions on career choice for longtermists — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Longtermism: An Introduction | Effective Altruismeffectivealtruism.org
- Effective altruism’s most controversial ideavox.com
- ⚡️ Towards Ineffective Altruismreboothq.substack.com
- Understanding "longtermism": Why this suddenly influential philosophy is so toxic - Salon.comsalon.com
- Longtermism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Longtermism Is Surprisingly Obviousbenthams.substack.com
- Persistent Path-Dependence: Why Our Actions Matter Long-Termforethought.org
- A Case Against Strong Longtermism | Vaden Masranivmasrani.github.io
- Post 45: Simplify EA Pitches to “Holy Shit, X-Risk” - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io