Basic, anti-intellectualism, and why you want The Row
morningfyi.substack.com · 1,568 words · saved by 1 readers
Why being basic no longer exists
Basic, Anti-intellectualism and Why You Want The Row Why being basic no longer exists MØRNING and Elizaveta Federmesser Apr 03, 2025 138 6 14 Share MØRNING. The Row is not basic. Or is it? In the high-stakes, low-consequences battleground of fashion semantics, the question of basicness has taken on a new tone. Even the simplest areas of style, from plain white t-shirts to Kim Kardashian’s wardrobe, have received the high concept treatment. But how do we escape this desire for intellectually ambiguous commodities? Who better to answer than BAGMAG ’s Elizaveta Federmesser … For over a month now,
saved by
related reading
- The age of average - Alex Murrellalexmurrell.co.uk
- Life After Lifestylesubpixel.space
- After Authenticitysubpixel.space
- The Anti-Slop Aesthetichyphen.art
- Personal Style Is Dead And The Algorithm Killed Itevilfemale.substack.com
- Why We Like Thingsasteriskmag.com
- Trickle-up fashion - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- J. Crew and the Paradoxes of Prep | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- What You Can't Saypaulgraham.com
- Mrs Prada & Raf Simmons on AI, Appropriation, and the Relevance of Fashioninterviewmagazine.com
- The collapse of coolsubstack.com
- Right Is The New Leftslatestarcodex.com