Basic, anti-intellectualism, and why you want The Row
morningfyi.substack.com · 1,568 words · saved by 1 readers
Why being basic no longer exists
Basic, Anti-intellectualism and Why You Want The Row Why being basic no longer exists MØRNING and Elizaveta Federmesser Apr 03, 2025 138 6 14 Share MØRNING. The Row is not basic. Or is it? In the high-stakes, low-consequences battleground of fashion semantics, the question of basicness has taken on a new tone. Even the simplest areas of style, from plain white t-shirts to Kim Kardashian’s wardrobe, have received the high concept treatment. But how do we escape this desire for intellectually ambiguous commodities? Who better to answer than BAGMAG ’s Elizaveta Federmesser … For over a month now,
saved by
related reading
- Nadia Asparouhova | Being basic as a virtuenadia.xyz
- Personal Style Is Dead And The Algorithm Killed Itevilfemale.substack.com
- After Authenticitysubpixel.space
- The Anti-Slop Aesthetichyphen.art
- Stop Thinking in Archetypes, Start Building in Genresfatemaraja.substack.com
- Means and Meaning - Not Boring by Packy McCormicknotboring.co
- WTF is taste and why is it the new intelligence?substack.com
- Why We Like Thingsasteriskmag.com
- Beware the ‘beige-fluencers’, cheerleaders for a life of no surprises | Sarah Manavis | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- consuming the girl - by Ava - bookbear expressavabear.xyz
- Capital-T Taste doesn't exist - by Jae Lubberinkpabulummill.substack.com
- Throwing a Fit About Throwing a Fit - 34th Street Magazine34st.com