Recommendations-for-Using-Red-Teaming-for-AI-Accountability-PolicyBrief.pdf
datasociety.net · 3,341 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
POLICY BRIEF AI Red-Teaming Is Not a One-Stop Solution to AI Harms: Recommendations for Using Red-Teaming for AI Accountability Sorelle Friedler, Ranjit Singh, Borhane Blili-Hamelin, Jacob Metcalf, and Brian J. Chen AI Red-Teaming is Not a One-Stop Solution to AI Harms: Recommendations for Using Red-Teaming for AI Accountability Red-teaming is a method where people — traditionally security engineers inside a company — interact with a system to try to make it produce undesired outcomes. The goal is to identify ways the system doesn’t work as intended, and then find fixes for the…
related reading
- Can We Red Team Our Way to AI Accountability? | TechPolicy.Presstechpolicy.press
- GitHub - requie/AI-Red-Teaming-Guide: A comprehensive guide to adversarial testing and security evaluation of AI systems, helping organizations identify vulnerabilities before attackers exploit them.github.com
- Mediumai-alignment.com
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- Democratizing Generative AI Red Teams | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- [2004.07213] Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimsarxiv.org
- Defining LLM Red Teaming | NVIDIA Technical Blogdeveloper.nvidia.com
- [2312.06942] AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversionarxiv.org
- 2312.06942arxiv.org
- Challenges in evaluating AI systems \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How our new Control Red Team is stress-testing frontier monitors | AISI Workaisi.gov.uk