Avoiding generative models is the rational and responsible thing to do – follow-up to “Trusting your own judgement on ‘AI...’”
It’s not a question of typos or grammatical errors or the like. Those always slip through somehow and, for the most part, don’t impact the meaning or argument of the post.
Avoiding generative models is the rational and responsible thing to do – follow-up to “Trusting your own judgement on ‘AI...’” Avoiding generative models is the rational and responsible thing to do – follow-up to “Trusting your own judgement on ‘AI...’” Skip to main content Avoiding generative models is the rational and responsible thing to do – follow-up to “Trusting your own judgement on ‘AI...’” 11 June 2025 - Baldur Bjarnason I don’t recommend publishing your first draft of a long blog post. It’s not a question of typos or grammatical errors or the like. Those always slip through somehow a
related reading
- Trusting your own judgement on ‘AI’ is a huge riskbaldurbjarnason.com
- AI in 2025: gestalt — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why You Should Almost Never Use AI to Write Anything Substantiveerichgrunewald.com
- The case for ensuring that powerful AIs are controlled — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Artificiality of Alignmentjoinreboot.org
- Consider chilling out in 2028 — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Case Against AI Control Research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Self-Fulfilling Misalignment Data Might Be Poisoning Our AI Modelsturntrout.com
- God help me am I about to change my view on AI-assisted writing?rivalvoices.substack.com
- Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- BCIs and the ecosystem of modular mindsberen.io