A supposedly great article I’ll never read the same way again | The Outline
theoutline.com · 1,445 words · saved by 1 readers
David Foster Wallace’s journalism is, in many ways, inaccurate. But he’s hardly the only venerated journalist to have made stuff up.
Jeremy Gordon May—13—2019 01:03PM EST Last week I was thinking about David Foster Wallace’s 2006 profile of Roger Federer in The New York Times’ ill-fated sports-themed Play magazine, and decided to reread it for the first time in a while. Though Wallace’s controversial reputation has rightfully been re-examined in recent years, the profile was the rare occasion of a great writer meeting a great athlete at their peak. Today’s elite athletes are more likely to be chronicled by medium-talent stenographers, release content on their own platforms, or go to
related reading
- New Journalism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Rewriting of David Foster Wallacevulture.com
- Half A Month Of Consolation Writing Adviceastralcodexten.com
- Christian Lorentzen · God wielded the buzzer: The Sorrows of DFWlrb.co.uk
- An Interview with David Foster Wallace - Believer Magazinethebeliever.net
- The Line Between Fact and Fiction - Creative Nonfictioncreativenonfiction.org
- Fake Journal Club: Teaching Critical Reading · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Fake Journal Club: Teaching Critical Reading · Gwern.netgwern.net
- David Foster Wallace and Democracy - Libertieslibertiesjournal.com
- A Conversation with David Foster Wallace By Larry McCafferydalkeyarchive.com
- Tom Wolfe: The Birth of ‘The New Journalism’nymag.com
- Patricia Lockwood · Where be your jibes now? David Foster Wallacelrb.co.uk