A Theory of Justified Reformulations | SpringerLink

link.springer.com · 273 words · saved by 1 readers

Part of the book series: The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science ((SECS,volume 87)) 109 Accesses 15 Citations Present day systems, intelligent or otherwise, are limited by the conceptualizations of the world given to them by their designers. In this paper, we propose a novel, first-principles approach to performing incremental reformulations for computational efficiency. First, we define a reformulation to be a shift in conceptualization: a change in the basic objects, functions, and relations assumed in a formulation. We then analyze the requirements for automating reformulation and show the need for justifying shifts in conceptualization. Inefficient formulations make irrelevant distinctions. A new class of meta-theoretical justifications for a reformulation called irrelevance explanations, is presented. A logical irrelevance explanation demonstrates that certain distinctions made in the formulation are not necessary for the computation of a given class of

Abstract Present day systems, intelligent or otherwise, are limited by the conceptualizations of the world given to them by their designers. In this paper, we propose a novel, first-principles approach to performing incremental reformulations for computational efficiency. First, we define a reformulation to be a shift in conceptualization: a change in the basic objects, functions, and relations assumed in a formulation. We then analyze the requirements for automating reformulation and show the need for justifying shifts in conceptualization. Inefficient formulations make irrelevant distinction

A Theory of Justified Reformulations | SpringerLink

related reading