Flock Wants a Closely Surveilled World with No Exit | The New Yorker
The company, which has a hundred and thirty thousand cameras monitoring the streets of the U.S., frames privacy as a worthwhile trade-off for safety and security, echoing the language of the post-9/11 surveillance boom.
Garrett Langley, the founder of Flock Safety, frames surveillance as a Faustian bargain. If we want to live in a world where “crime is unsustainable” and “a thing of the past,” in his words, then we must “sacrifice our privacy.” Imagine: no more carjackings or kidnappings, murders or robberies, rapes or vandalism. “Everyone, in my opinion, deserves the right to be safe,” Langley said, during a TED talk last month. “It should not matter the color of your skin, your political affiliation, or your income level.” Langley, who is thirty-nine, tells the story of creating Flock from the vantage…
saved by
related reading
- Garrett Langley of Flock Safety on building technology to solve crimesubstack.com
- A cop's case for Flock - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
- The Transparent Society | WIREDwired.com
- Moxie Marlinspike Has a Plan to Reclaim Our Privacy | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Surveillance Is Not Safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacysignal.org
- Privacy for Students | Surveillance Self-Defensessd.eff.org
- How A 'Deviant' Philosopher Built Palantir, A CIA-Funded Data-Mining Juggernautforbes.com
- A Black Woman Invented Home Security. Why Did It Go So Wrong? | WIREDwired.com
- The Thin Purple Line, by Jasper Cravenharpers.org
- After George Floyd’s murder, police built a secretive surveillance machine that lives on | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Esther Hovers Recreates Scenes Of Suspicious Behavior To Question Surveillance In Society - IGNANTignant.com
- What Is Privacy For? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com