Where Should the Climate Movement Go Next? | The Nation
thenation.com · 4,131 words · saved by 1 readers
Andreas Malm thinks climate politics needs to reject pacifism for sabotage.
July 25, 2022 This article appears in the August 8/15, 2022 issue . Illustration by Tim Robinson. In 1957, as the postwar economic boom led to a “great acceleration” in hydrocarbon energy use, a group of scientists working for a Texas-based petroleum company called Humble Oil (later renamed ExxonMobil) embarked on a study prompted by growing public concern over air pollution and new research on the consequences of burning fossil fuels. What they found was that the “enormous quantity of carbon dioxide” in the atmosphere was linked to the “combustion of fossil fuels.” Sixty-five year
related reading
- Nadia Asparouhova | Mapping out the tribes of climatenadia.xyz
- Why climate despair is a luxury - New Statesmannewstatesman.com
- After Climate Despair - The New Atlantisthenewatlantis.com
- An Ever-Smaller Board - by Bill McKibbenbillmckibben.substack.com
- Debunking Fossil Fuel Hysteria: An Interview with Alex Epstein | Mises Institutemises.org
- A Better World Is Not Possible | Los Angeles Review of Bookslareviewofbooks.org
- Climate Change from A to Z | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Haltung zur Klimakrise: Vor der letzten Ratenzahlung geht die Welt unterzeit.de
- Stories About Progress — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Losing Earth: The Decade We Almost Stopped Climate Change - The New York Timesnytimes.com
- The challenging politics of climate change | Brookingsbrookings.edu
- Climate change | 80,000 Hours80000hours.org