Eliezer's Sequences and Mainstream Academia — LessWrong
Due in part to Eliezer's writing style (e.g. not many citations), and in part to Eliezer's scholarship preferences (e.g. his preference to figure out…
x Eliezer's Sequences and Mainstream Academia — LessWrong Rationality A-Z (discussion & meta) Philosophy Site Meta Frontpage 254 Eliezer's Sequences and Mainstream Academia by lukeprog 15th Sep 2012 4 min read 148 254 Due in part to Eliezer's writing style (e.g. not many citations), and in part to Eliezer's scholarship preferences (e.g. his preference to figure out much of philosophy on his own), Eliezer's Sequences don't accurately reflect the close agreement between the content of The Sequences and work previously done in mainstream academia. I predict several effects from this: Some readers
related reading
- Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Original Sequences — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationalism before the Sequences — LessWronglesswrong.com
- LessWronglesswrong.com
- Original Sequences — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Less Wrong Rationality and Mainstream Philosophy — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Eliezer's Unteachable Methods of Sanity — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Less Wrong Rationality and Mainstream Philosophy — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Do people think Less Wrong rationality is parochial? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why is every rationalist blog post way too long?alexwennerberg.com