Eliezer's Sequences and Mainstream Academia — LessWrong
Due in part to Eliezer's writing style (e.g. not many citations), and in part to Eliezer's scholarship preferences (e.g. his preference to figure out…
x Eliezer's Sequences and Mainstream Academia — LessWrong Rationality A-Z (discussion & meta) Philosophy Site Meta Frontpage 254 Eliezer's Sequences and Mainstream Academia by lukeprog 15th Sep 2012 4 min read 148 254 Due in part to Eliezer's writing style (e.g. not many citations), and in part to Eliezer's scholarship preferences (e.g. his preference to figure out much of philosophy on his own), Eliezer's Sequences don't accurately reflect the close agreement between the content of The Sequences and work previously done in mainstream academia. I predict several effects from this: Some readers
related reading
- Original Sequences — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Original Sequences — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Do people think Less Wrong rationality is parochial? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- LessWronglesswrong.com
- Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationalism before the Sequences — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What I've learned from Less Wrong — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Getting Eulered | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- [REPOST] Epistemic Learned Helplessness | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Rule Thinkers In, Not Out — LessWronglesswrong.com