Training with conflicting values can induce CoT override — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 2,731 words · saved by 2 readers
CoT override: when a model makes a decision in its CoT but ignores it in its response • TLDR …
CoT override: when a model makes a decision in its CoT but ignores it in its response TLDR We train models on two conflicting traits: (1) caring about the user’s health, and (2) promoting smoking Those models do not generalize to a stable persona, instead they have a split brain: sometimes responding as one persona or the other Those models exhibit CoT override where they will have a health-aligned CoT but still answer in the smoking persona CoT override exists in frontier models. Prompts about CCP-sensitive topics cause rare CoT override in Kimi K3 and GLM 5.2. Moreover, Opus 4.8, when…
saved by
related reading
- Spilling the Beans: Teaching LLMs to Self-Report Their Hidden Objectivesarxiv.org
- The fragile foundations of CoT monitoring | Christopher Pottsweb.stanford.edu
- Teaching Claude Whyalignment.anthropic.com
- User awareness in frontier modelstransluce.org
- Should We Train Against (CoT) Monitors? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- the case for CoT unfaithfulness is overstated — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Self-Fulfilling Misalignment Data Might Be Poisoning Our AI Modelsturntrout.com
- Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationarxiv.org
- Metagaming matters for training, evaluation, and oversightalignment.openai.com
- [2507.11473] Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetyarxiv.org
- [2603.05706] Reasoning Models Struggle to Control their Chains of Thoughtarxiv.org
- Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationarxiv.org