0521811449c09.tex
cambridge.org · 677 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
Summary Research in recent years has highlighted the limits of the Stalinist state. Asidefrom the numerous forms of resistance, both physical and symbolic, which theyfaced, Soviet bureaucracies under Stalin often lacked the resources orco-ordination to provide a consistent and effective system of administration. Inbetween campaigns, as one commentator has noted of the countryside in the late1930s, ‘neglect by Soviet power was as characteristic as coercion, andperhaps sometimes even as much resented’. Despite these limitations, theStalinist state did have the capacity to mobilise its…
saved by
related reading
- Joseph Stalin's cult of personality - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- How to Stage a Coup - by Santi Ruiz - Statecraftstatecraft.pub
- Great Purge - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- De-Stalinization - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- A Big Little Idea Called Legibility — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- Rootless cosmopolitan - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Why Vladimir Putin is beholden to Stalin's legacy - New Statesmannewstatesman.com
- Book Review: Seeing Like A Stateslatestarcodex.com
- Do not conquer what you cannot defend — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How to Read a Societycity-journal.org
- Government in the Futurechomsky.info
- The Censor Who Ended the Soviet Unionpalladiummag.com