0521811449c09.tex
cambridge.org · 677 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
Summary Research in recent years has highlighted the limits of the Stalinist state. Asidefrom the numerous forms of resistance, both physical and symbolic, which theyfaced, Soviet bureaucracies under Stalin often lacked the resources orco-ordination to provide a consistent and effective system of administration. Inbetween campaigns, as one commentator has noted of the countryside in the late1930s, ‘neglect by Soviet power was as characteristic as coercion, andperhaps sometimes even as much resented’. Despite these limitations, theStalinist state did have the capacity to mobilise its…
saved by
related reading
- Joseph Stalin's cult of personality - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Great Purge - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Why Vladimir Putin is beholden to Stalin's legacy - New Statesmannewstatesman.com
- De-Stalinization - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Soviet Creativerussianlife.com
- Economy of the Soviet Union - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Tyranny of Stucturelessjofreeman.com
- The Censor Who Ended the Soviet Unionpalladiummag.com
- Nikita Khrushchev - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- How to Read a Societycity-journal.org
- the-power-of-the-powerless.pdfnonviolent-conflict.org