The dumbest chess AI has a lesson for us - The Atlantic
theatlantic.com · 1,159 words · saved by 1 readers
Martin is designed to fail at its only task—a reminder that AI doesn’t actually need humanlike smarts to be useful.
When IBM’s Deep Blue first defeated Garry Kasparov in 1997, the world chess champion accused the company of cheating. There was no way, he thought, that the computer could have beaten him without direct assistance from a skilled human player. But now the situation has flipped entirely. When grandmasters find themselves at the receiving end of a few mind-blowingly brilliant moves today, they accuse their opponent of using a computer . The only worthwhile competition for top chess engines is one another. The programs have become too powerful; humankind has lost. But as the machines push toward c
related reading
- How Go Players Disempower Themselves to AI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- ChatGPT Is Dumber Than You Think - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- kasparov-articleweb.mit.edu
- Playing chess with large language modelsnicholas.carlini.com
- The Future Role of Human Excellence - Too-biasedtobi.lutke.com
- AI Friends Too Cheap To Meterjasmi.news
- AI excels at code competitions, struggles with real workblog.peterwildeford.com
- LLM Chess: Benchmarking Reasoning and Instruction-Following in LLMs through Chessarxiv.org
- Chess-GPT’s Internal World Model | Adam Karvonenadamkarvonen.github.io
- Grandmaster-Level Chess Without Searcharxiv.org
- The Human Skill That Eludes AI - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- AI Chess Leaderboard - dubesor AI projectdubesor.de