Meet the Vitalists: the hardcore longevity enthusiasts who believe death is “wrong” | MIT Technology Review
web.archive.org · 6,286 words · saved by 1 readers
They argue we need a revolution—and more and more influential scientists, funders, and politicians are taking them seriously.
“Who here believes involuntary death is a good thing?” Nathan Cheng has been delivering similar versions of this speech over the last couple of years, so I knew what was coming. He was about to try to convince the 80 or so people in the audience that death is bad. And that defeating it should be humanity’s number one priority—quite literally, that it should come above all else in the social and political hierarchy. “If you believe that life is good and there's inherent moral value to life,” he told them, “it stands to reason that the ultimate logical conclusion here is that we should try…
related reading
- Why Cryonics Makes Sense — Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- Effective altruism’s most controversial ideavox.com
- ⚡️ Towards Ineffective Altruismreboothq.substack.com
- Bryan Johnson wants to start a new religion in which “the body is God”web.archive.org
- Understanding "longtermism": Why this suddenly influential philosophy is so toxic - Salon.comsalon.com
- Why I am not a longtermist – Windows On Theorywindowsontheory.org
- The Island Where People Go to Cheat Death | The New Republicnewrepublic.com
- Anti-Aging: State of the Art — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Prolegomena to a Theory of Fun — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Bottlenecks of Aging - Amaranth Foundationamaranth.foundation
- The longevity tech market map: 64 startups racing to defy deathcbinsights.com
- On Longevityeriktorenberg.substack.com