Pedersen Commitments, Divide-and-Conquer, and the Inner Product Argument - notes.0xparc.org
notes.0xparc.org · 1,927 words · saved by 1 readers
Supporting application R&D on Ethereum and decentralized platforms.
Pedersen Commitments, Divide-and-Conquer, and the Inner Product Argument - notes.0xparc.org Toggle navigation notes.0xparc.org Research Notes Problems Results Search More 0xPARC Pedersen Commitments, Divide-and-Conquer, and the Inner Product Argument Pedersen commitments Proving you know a vector (Part 1: Hiding) Proving you know a vector (Part 2: Succinctness) Proving security Making the protocol more efficient Inner product argument Pedersen Commitments, Divide-and-Conquer, and the Inner Product Argument Dankrad Feist has a terrific post explaining Pedersen commitments, a commitment scheme t
related reading
- Inner Product Arguments · Dankrad Feistdankradfeist.de
- ProofsArgsAndZK.pdfpeople.cs.georgetown.edu
- Zero Knowledge Proofs: An illustrated primer – A Few Thoughts on Cryptographic Engineeringblog.cryptographyengineering.com
- 370.pdfeprint.iacr.org
- 1021.pdfeprint.iacr.org
- Commitment scheme - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- bulletproofs::inner_product_proof - Rustdoc-internal.dalek.rs
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and Moreeprint.iacr.org
- KZG polynomial commitments · Dankrad Feistdankradfeist.de
- Zero-knowledge proof - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Halo and more: exploring incremental verification and SNARKs without pairingsvitalik.eth.limo
- Unbundling PBS: Towards protocol-enforced proposer commitments (PEPC) - Economics - Ethereum Researchethresear.ch