Three Ideas for Regulating Generative AI
normaltech.ai · 1,124 words · saved by 1 readers
Policy input to the federal government from a Stanford-Princeton team
Last week, we submitted comments to the National Telecommunication and Infrastructure Authority (NTIA), written in collaboration with Rishi Bommasani, Daniel Zhang, and Percy Liang at Stanford. In our comments, we describe the need for transparency around the generative AI ecosystem, the need for holistic public evaluations, and the guardrails needed for responsible open-source AI research and development. This post is a summary of our comments. Transparency about the digital supply chain that powers generative AI products Generative AI models are the building blocks for various digital…
related reading
- Dario Amodei — Policy on the AI Exponentialdarioamodei.com
- Generative AI’s Act Two | Sequoia Capitalsequoiacap.com
- Who Owns the Generative AI Platform? | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- Who Owns the Generative AI Platform? | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- What Should Be Donehyperdimensional.co
- Responsible Generative AI Tutorialsites.google.com
- Is the future of AI open or closed? Watch today’s Princeton-Stanford workshopnormaltech.ai
- On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Modelsnormaltech.ai
- What the executive order means for openness in AInormaltech.ai
- Frontier AI Regulation | GovAIgovernance.ai
- Generative AI companies must publish transparency reportsnormaltech.ai
- LAION-5B, Stable Diffusion 1.5, and the Original Sin of Generative AI | TechPolicy.Presstechpolicy.press