There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 10,973 words · saved by 1 readers
Trees are not a biologically consistent category. They're just something that keeps happening in lots of different groups of plants. This is a fun fa…
x There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) — LessWrong Best of LessWrong 2021 Biology Evolution Philosophy of Language World Modeling Curated 350 There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by eukaryote 3rd May 2021 Linkpost for eukaryotewritesblog.com 9 min read 60 350 [Crossposted from Eukaryote Writes Blog.] So you’ve heard about how fish aren’t a monophyletic group? You’ve heard about carcinization , the process by which ocean arthropods convergently evolve into crabs? You say you get it now? Sit down. Sit down. Shut up. Listen. You don’t know nothing yet. “Trees” are not
saved by
related reading
- There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically)eukaryotewritesblog.com
- The Categories Were Made For Man, Not Man For The Categories | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- How An Algorithm Feels From Inside — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Phylogenetic tree - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun?davidgraeber.org
- What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun?thebaffler.com
- Plant evolutionary developmental biology - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Thou Art Godshatter — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Frame-Dependent Mindsoftmax.com
- The Categories Were Made For Man, Not Man For The Categoriesweb.archive.org
- Prefer associative ontologies to hierarchical taxonomiesnotes.andymatuschak.org
- Mysterious Answers to Mysterious Questions — LessWronglesswrong.com