Proofs That P - by Bentham's Bulldog - Bentham's Newsletter
Huemer: some people have denied that P. This has a crucial problem: it’s obviously false (chuckles). Therefore, P. Parfit: we might adopt view, O, according to which ~P. This, in my view, would be a very grave mistake. Therefore, I suggest, we should adopt view P, according to which: P. Lance Bush: I don’t know what you mean by ~P. Bentham’s Bulldog (ME): P is obviously true. Our denial of P comes from the fact that we find it hard to empathize with small, simple conclusions like P, rather than larger, macro-scale conclusions (like ~P, which is larger on account of the extra tilde). But this is clearly irrational. Socrates: Why, surely you would agree that P is true with respect to the potter? And what of the ship-builder? Is it not true for him also? So then isn’t P true generally? Joe Schmid: To my mind, there are many distinct plausible accounts in the literature according to which P. I confess that I—while highly uncertain, to be sure—find myself extremely attracted to these accoun
Inspired by Huemer. Huemer: some people have denied that P. This has a crucial problem: it’s obviously false (chuckles). Therefore, P. Parfit: we might adopt view, O, according to which ~P. This, in my view, would be a very grave mistake. Therefore, I suggest, we should adopt view P, according to which: P. Lance Bush: I don’t know what you mean by ~P. Bentham’s Bulldog (ME): P is obviously true. Our denial of P comes from the fact that we find it hard to empathize with small, simple conclusions like P, rather than larger, macro-scale conclusions (like ~P, which is larger on account of…
saved by
related reading
- Proofs That Pbenthams.substack.com
- Derek Parfit - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- [REPOST] Epistemic Learned Helplessness | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Dark Side Epistemology — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Definability of Truth in Probabilistic Logic - Christiano 2013intelligence.org
- Two Dogmas of Empiricism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Your Strength as a Rationalist — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Against truthsamkriss.substack.com
- Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Privileging the Hypothesis — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Reasons to believescottaaronson.blog