Intent-Based Architectures and Their Risks - Paradigm
paradigm.xyz · 2,994 words · saved by 1 readers
The road to centralisation is paved with good intents.
Intent-Based Architecture and Their Risks 06.01.2023 By Georgios Konstantopoulos , Quintus Kilbourn [L] Listen [S] Share Link , Markdown , X , LinkedIn Introduction Recently, discussion around “intents” and their application have been a dominant topic in the Ethereum community. If a transaction explicitly refers to “how” an action should be performed, an intent refers to “what” the desired outcome of that action should be. If a transaction says “do A then B, pay exactly C to get X back” , an intent says “I want X and I’m willing to pay up to C” . This declarative paradigm unlocks exciting impr
related reading
- Towards an intent-centric topology | The Anoma Bloganoma.net
- Should Ethereum be okay with enshrining more things in the protocol?vitalik.eth.limo
- Decentralizing the Builder Rolejoncharbonneau.substack.com
- The Meaning of Decentralizationmedium.com
- Approaches to MEV: Ethereum vs Cosmos | Reveriereverie.ooo
- An Analysis of Intent-Based Marketsarxiv.org
- Asset Based Intent Standard: An Intent Standard for the World of Digital Assetsblog.essential.builders
- Introducing ERC-7521: Generalized Intents for Smart Contract Walletsblog.essential.builders
- On Abstraction | Ethereum Foundation Blogblog.ethereum.org
- Unbundling PBS: Towards protocol-enforced proposer commitments (PEPC) - Economics - Ethereum Researchethresear.ch
- The Intent Layer | Intent Systemsintent-systems.com
- On Collusionvitalik.eth.limo